| |
It is with great honor and humility
that I accept the petition candidacy for the position of 2006 IEEE President-Elect.
I have the global vision (i.e., IEEE should be “The
Global Resource of Choice” for scientific, educational and professional
products and services) and the necessary qualifications
to address the unprecedented challenges currently confronting
our members and our profession – we can address them through creative
and collaborative actions.
Qualifications.
I have extensive IEEE experience, including being culturally sensitive
[having resided in IEEE Regions 1 (MA, NJ, NY), 9 (Brazil) and 10 (China)],
technically engaged [active in 4 Societies (Computers;
Control Systems; Robotics & Automation; Systems, Man, & Cybernetics)],
and professionally involved [member (since 1974); volunteer
(since 1983); active on 4 of IEEE’s 7 Major Boards – TAB (10
years), PSPB (7 years), BoD (4 years), EAB (3 years)]. I have a BEE (RPI’66),
MS (MIT’67), and PhD (MIT’72) and have worked in industry
[Bell Telephone Laboratories; The Rand Corporation; currently, Structured
Decisions Corporation (SDC)] and in academia [RPI faculty
(since 1977)]. I have demonstrated leadership skills
[IEEE VP, PSPB & EAB; VP, SDC; RPI Department Chair (since 1985);
RPI Acting Dean of Engineering (1992-1994, 1998-1999)] and demonstrated
excellence [IEEE (Fellow, J. G. Wohl Outstanding Career Award,
Third Millennium Medal, Major Educational Innovation Award, Norbert Wiener
Award) and other technical awards, including Fellow of INFORMS and AAAS
and election to the U.S. National Academy of Engineering].
Challenges. Since 2000,
the IEEE-related industries (e.g., computers, electronics, telecommunications,
etc.) have experienced an extended economic downturn, resulting in lay-offs,
obsolescence and commoditization. As a learned society, the IEEE must
lead the way to overcome these and related challenges. Technical
challenges include: maintaining our distinctive advantage of excellence
through peer review of our intellectual property (IP); nurturing an entrepreneurial
technical structure that can recognize emerging technologies and act nimbly;
and meeting our individual needs, which are clearly different at different
stages in our professional career and in different countries and cultures.
Financial challenges include: moving to electronic publishing
while safeguarding the value of and the net income from our IP; meeting
the competition posed by aggressive commercial publishers, by free preprint
and postprint web sites, and by cost-conscious academic publishers; and
innovating “faster, better and cheaper” ways of packaging,
distributing and leveraging our IP. Member challenges
include: promoting IEEE’s global networking benefits; enhancing
and equalizing IEEE’s member services, especially in regard to the
portability of such services; and improving member involvement in both
IEEE’s governance and volunteer activities. Member-related, professional
challenges include: bridging to industry with attractive products and
services that corporations need and value; partnering with industry to
ensure the quality and viability of the engineering “pipeline”;
and raising the public’s awareness and appreciation for engineering
and engineers.
Actions. In order to be
“the global resource of choice” for scientific, educational
and professional products and services, we must assiduously enhance our
member benefits and advance the stature of our profession. We must ensure
IEEE’s technical excellence, while maintaining
the Institute’s financial viability, enhancing
membership advantage, and meeting our professional
needs. We can do it – through a synergistic partnership
among all our constituents, including our “non-member volunteers”
(who comprise about 60 percent of: our contributing authors, our paper
reviewers and our conference attendees); our non-member institutions (which
purchase our IP and provide over half of our total revenues); our member
volunteers (who define, in a collegial manner, “what” products
and services should be produced and marketed); and our talented staff
(who, in addition to supporting member volunteers, are charged with “how”
to accomplish the goal). As example actions, our Membership Development
Committee should consider providing a cafeteria of benefits and a fixed
number of Member Benefit Credits (MBCs) to each IEEE member (thus allowing
members to optimize their membership advantage by annually self-customizing
their benefits); our Board of Directors should strategize and advance
the IEEE globally while allowing the regional IEEE units (including the
IEEE-USA) to act locally in support of their members´ careers (thus
advancing IEEE´s global value while enhancing IEEE´s local
membership advantage); and our Educational Activities Board (EAB) should
continue to help our technical units put the best of their conference
tutorials and short courses into the Thomson-IEEE Expert Now learning
library (thus meeting the continuing educational needs, including the
awarding of professional development hours, of both industry and our own
members, while providing another IP revenue stream).
|
|
TOGETHER,
WE CAN ADVANCE
IEEE's GLOBAL VALUE
James M. Tien, Ph.D., NAE
Yamada Corporation Professor
Chair and Professor, Department of Decision Sciences and Engineering
Systems Professor, Department of Electrical,
Computer, and Systems Engineering
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, New York 12180-3590, USA
518-276-6486
tienj@rpi.edu
|
|
|
|