![]() |
Instructor's Guide to Activity: The Critical Angle and Fiber Optics (Simulation-Based) |
In today's activity, you will use simulations
to measure the critical angle for a plastic prism and then investigate
the effects of total internal reflection for fiber optics.
The readings about these topics are found in the module on Reflection,
Refraction, and Fiber Optics.
Preparatory
Questions:
The following questions should have been answered
before the start of the activity. Your instructor may ask you to
discuss your answers with group members or as a class before continuing.
Measuring
the Critical Angle of a Plastic for a Given Wavelength
| Go to the web site http://www.physics.northwestern.edu/ugrad/vpl/optics/snell.html. You will see a simulation of light moving from one medium at the top of the screen to another medium below. n1 and n2 represent the indices of refraction in the top and bottom medium, respectively. Notice that the different color lines do NOT represent different colors of light. The light is monochromatic laser light. The different colors identify the incident ray (blue), the reflected ray (green) and the refracted ray (red). |
![]() |
| 1. | The default settings have n1
less than n2. Try entering
different angles of incidence q1,
ranging from 1o to 89o.
Describe what happens to the refracted beam and reflected beam as you increase
the angle of incidence. Do you ever achieve total internal reflection?
How do you know?
As the angle of incidence increases, the angles of reflection and refraction increase, with all three light rays moving closer to the surface. TIR will not be achieved in this situation since light is traveling from a rarer medium to a denser medium. This is verified by observation that the refracted (red) ray never reaches the surface - the angle of refraction remains well below the requisite 90 degrees. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | Now set n1=1.54
and n2=1.00 to simulate light exiting
plastic and entering air. Again, enter different angles of incidence
q1
ranging from 1o to 89o.
Do you ever achieve total internal reflection with this set up? How
do you know? Is this what you predicted in the Preparatory Questions?
TIR is achieved - the refracted ray approaches the surface, then vanishes. Hopefully this was predicted. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | You will next determine the value of the critical angle
for this interface by trying various values of q1,
and recording the resulting q2,
(or indicating whether total internal reflection has occurred). If
you have not achieved total internal reflection for a given value of q1,
should you increase or decrease q1
in
your next attempt?
Increase. The angle of incidence must be greater than (or equal to) the critical angle for TIR to occur. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. | If you have achieved total internal reflection for a
given value of q1,
does that necessarily mean that q1
is the critical angle? How will you know when the critical angle
has been reached?
No. Any angle higher than the critical angle will produce TIR. The critical angle is the miminum q1 that produces TIR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | Write down at least 10 values of q1
which you tried as you looked for the critical angle, along with the resulting
sin
q2
given by the simulation. Use the given sin q2
to calculate q2.
Your values of q1
should show a gradual approach to the critical angle.
Here is a sample set of student data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | Record your value for the critical angle to the nearest
0.1 degree as found from the simulation. How does this critical angle
compare to the one you predicted for plastic in the Preparatory Questions?
Based on the above data, the critical angle is 40.5o. This is in exact agreement with the calculation in the Preparatory Questions. It should be within 0.1 degree of the student's predicted value. |
Applications to Optical Fibers
Go to this simulation of optical fibers by the Universitat Oldenburg, and answer the following questions. A few notes about the simulation:
| 8. | Will the angle of entry i affect whether or not
the light is totally internally reflected as it enters the fiber?
If so, how? If not, why not?
Yes. the angle at which light enters the fiber determines its angle of incidence on the fiber wall. If the angle of entry is too big, the angle of incidence on the fiber wall will be less than the critical angle, causing light to escape. |
| 9. | Based on what you know about total internal reflection,
what range of values of n2 (relative
to the core index n1) will keep
the light trapped in the fiber? (You may assume the angle of incidence
on the edge of the fiber is larger than the critical angle) Try out
ns
from your range and check.
The cladding index n2 must be less than the core index n1 if TIR is to occur. |
| 10. | Some of the n2
values you expected to trap light in the fiber might have let light escape
in the simulation due to the angle at which light strikes the edge of the
fiber. In these situations would you need to increase or decrease
the
angle at which light strikes the top edge of the fiber (as measured
to the normal) to trap the light?
If light escapes, the angle of incidence at the top edge is less than the critical angle, so you need to increase the angle of incidence on the top edge. |
| 11. | Does this desired increase or decrease in the angle at
the edge of the fiber correspond to an increase or decrease of the entry
angle i at which the light enters the fiber? Use the simulation
to verify your answer.
To increase the angle of incidence at the top edge, one must decrease the angle of entry i. |
| 12. | Set the indices to n1=1.54
and n2 = 1.50, and find the largest
value of i that results in total internal reflection by trying different
values of i. Compare your result to the cut-off angle
given by the simulation.
To three decimal places, the maximum angle of entry is 20.4 degrees, in agreement with the cut-off angle calculated by the simulation. |
| 13. | If you were designing a fiber, do you think you would
prefer for your light to enter at an angle close to (but still less than)
the cut-off angle, or at a much smaller angle close to zero degrees?
What potential benefits do you envision this having?
The primary advantage of light entering at an entry angle of close to zero is if all the light did so. If all of the light entering a fiber enters in a narrow cone, it travels essentially the same path and does not spread out, or disperse. (Such "modal dispersion" is the topic for another module.) A more basic way to look at it is that light entering along the axis of the fiber takes a more direct route and spends less time bouncing around than light that enters near the cut-off angle. Or, that light entering near the cut-off is more likely to exceed the critical angle at an edge should the fiber bend. Students might argue that light entering along the axis travels a shorter distance and so arrives more quickly. You could point out that such an advantage could be negated at the first bend. Additionally, the time it takes a single information "packet" to travel a fiber is much less important than the delay between information packets, or bits. The delay is dictated by dispersion (spreading), not by the transit time. |
Copyright © 1999-2004 Doris Jeanne Wagner and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. All Rights Reserved.