Science Fiction Virtual Reality:  Email


[return to main message page]

A tangent to the discussion of the net

Andrew D. Tinkham <>

Thursday, September 05, 1996 2:58 PM

As a tangent to the discussion of nettiquette and the increasing commercialization of the 'Net, I thought that I would forward this column that I got. What do people think that the role of existing media companies should be (if any) on the 'Net? Also, to tie it in to EG, are there any opinions on how online newspapers or similar types of things as discussed in this column tie into the net as depicted in the book?


--- Forwarded mail from (David S. Bennahum)

Thu, 5 Sep 1996 14:09:45 -0500

"David S. Bennahum" <>

MEME 2.10


meme: (pron. 'meem') A contagious idea that replicates like a virus, passed on from mind to mind. Memes function the same way genes and viruses do, propagating through communication networks and face-to-face contact between people. Root of the word "memetics," a field of study which postulates that the meme is the basic unit of cultural evolution. Examples of memes include melodies, icons, fashion statements and phrases.


MEME 2.10


"We have always known that Microsoft was going to come in with big guns. That is one of the reasons we came up with this early Web presence," Gena Maniscalo says. "Timing is everything, and we are ahead." Maniscalo, Executive Director of Boston.Com, a Web site built by the Boston Globe newspaper, is on the front-lines of an escalating info-war in cyberspace. I recently spoke with Maniscalo, along with interactive media directors at The Washington Post, Dallas Morning News and Sacramento Bee, along with representatives of AOL, AT&T and Microsoft, all of whom now find themselves in the same business. This fall, a war for our eyes and mice is poised to go public, arriving at a Web site near you.

With surprisingly little fanfare, a who's-who of media and communications in the United States has simultaneously decided that the "killer app" that will morph the Web from a novelty to a necessity is a simple metaphor, what some call "digital cities." Each player comes to the Web with a particular strategy, however all are vying for the same goal: to be the online resource for information about your city. AOL, AT&T, Microsoft, the Boston Globe, New York Times, Washington Post, over 300 daily newspapers to date, television stations, and radio stations are all online building variations on this go-local theme. At stake, according to the players, is the $66 billion spent annually on local advertising in the United States -- money that now goes to the "old" media -- television, radio and newspapers.

The money invested in these sites is huge -- a billion or so. Microsoft's project, code-named "Cityscape" is estimated to have a US $500M budget. America Online's "Digital Cites" project has $100M in capital. AT&T's "Hometown Network" has an undisclosed budget, which, according to industry analysts, falls somewhere close to AOL's budget. Tack on the 300 odd newspapers, with 5 to 10 new ones coming online weekly, each with budgets ranging from $100,000 to millions, along with local televisionand radio stations, and it's clear that an awful lot is being wagered on this city concept.


Newspapers are caught in the middle of this stampede -- damned-if-they-do, damned-if-they-don't. At the heart of these city strategies is a simple calculation. A lot of money is spent on advertising for local products. If people became accustomed to getting local information online, a portion of these ad budgets will migrate from the "old" media to the "new" media. U.S. Newspapers received approximately $36 billion in advertising last year, and 80% of that was placed by local vendors, as opposed to national advertisers. These local ads are sometimes referred to as "the newspaper's franchise." Consequently, newspaper publishers see these online ventures as a threat. They also recognize that computer networks are not a passing fad. They are here to stay.

The logical choice, at first glance, is for newspapers to jump into the Web, build a local site there, cross-fingers, and hope that somehow, someway whatever ad revenue is siphoned off into cyberspace will remain within their corporate balance-sheet. Newspapers, however, don't have particularly deep-pockets, and going online in style is expensive. According to Forrester Research, a Cambridge, Massachusetts, market-research firm, typical Web sites will lose $3.9 million beyond their initial investment before turning profitable. Worse, the average site is expected to continue bleeding money until at least the year 2000 or later when, if you follow the number of people going online, 20% of the U.S. adult population will have Web access.

So the newspapers could opt out, hanging on the sidelines. But what if they're wrong? What if, after all, these city-sites are the "killer app"? Then they've blown it. Ad dollars will flow out of the newspaper to a new competitor. This is their dilemma, and either way all but the best-financed papers are vulnerable, eyeing a deep and dark money-pit. They cannot afford to lose big money online. If they do, it could drive some of them into the red, and from there it's a dangerous game whose price could be the existence of their newspaper.

The "new" media players -- AOL, AT&T, Microsoft -- understand this dynamic, and it is playing in their favor. They can afford to spend big money, be wrong, and lose it (at least AT&T and Microsoft can). For instance, in Microsoft's last fiscal year, the average employee generated $108,103 in profits. The average newspaper employee produced $6,781. While this in part reflects the very different nature of these industries -- Microsoft's is less labor intensive, while newspapers require an armada of personnel, from truck drivers to editors -- it underscores the financial risk Microsoft can take.

What's disturbing, however, is how untested this city metaphor is, and how convinced everyone is that this is the right way to go. Ultimately, these ideas devolve towards shopping guides -- best movie, best clothing sale, best play, best restaurant, best hotel. It is unclear that this alone can anchor people's interest by bringing essential repeat visits. Another option is to deliver news online. This is attractive, but the odds of several hundred news sites thriving is counter-intuitive -- perhaps a dozen could, but hundreds? How many versions of a national or international story can people stand to read? Delivering super-specific local news is one option, whether this can lead to a thriving online business is a highly speculative assumption. I find all these options oddly anachronistic, in quasi-denial of what's new with computer networks. Interestingly, the one option that might work is rarely mentioned, what I call "taking the pulse" of a city.


Imagine, briefly, that your city is an organism with people as cells, cells forming organs, which in turn form the whole. These organs are our civic institutions, businesses, and cultural gatherings. As large groups, we create events moment by moment -- traffic snarls here, subway delays there, hospitals with overflow here, ticket-sales blooming across town. In turn, these movements have history, called patterns. Some hospitals are slower at delivering emergency care than others, some intersections are notoriously clogged. Some city offices deliver certain services faster than others, at different times. Add in volume of financial transactions at movie theaters, automatic teller machines and restaurants, for instance. Toss in reported crime by type and location. Pretty soon you have an accurate reflection of your city which could be useful in a way that does not replicate the existing "old" media.

Cyberspace is exciting partly because it offers new forms of expression and widens our ability to reach each other devoid of an intermediary. The shame with these city ideas is that they could wind up silencing sections of the "old" media, forcing a round of consolidation in the newspaper industry as the cost of these new ventures forces weaker players to seek financial salvation. It's doubly upsetting if these city metaphors turn out to be unappealing, destined to be categorized as yet another high-tech boondoggle with a nasty side-effect. In the United States where freedom of the press was explicitly established as a bulwark of democracy it's a bitter irony that the Net, a medium celebrated as a means of supporting the free-flow of ideas, may contribute to the contraction of ideas offline.

A list of interesting city-based Web sites:

The Boston Globe, with their Boston city-guide:

Citysearch, acquired by AT&T, and their guide:

The Dallas Morning News and its publisher have many cities:

An interesting, AT&T affiliated, guide to Minneapolis:

Future home of AOL's Digital Cities, Inc.:

The Sacramento Bee newspaper does Sacramento, California:


The contents of MEME are (c) by David S. Bennahum. Pass on the MEME anywhere you want, including other discussion lists, for *non-commercial* use.

Just be sure to keep this signature file at the end.

MEME propagates bi-weekly. You can subscribe to MEME directly via email by emailing LISTSERV@SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU with a message that reads "subscribe MEME firstname lastname" where firsname is replaced by your first name and lastname by your last name (do not include the quote symbols.)

MEME is sponsored by Marketing Computers magazine:

Visit the WWW home of MEME, including back issues at Into the Matrix:

Send comments to


[return to message index]

Re: A tangent to the discussion of the net

Daniel M. Cohen <cohend3>

Thu, 05 Sep 1996 18:41 -0400

in Andrew D. Tinkham's message:

If people became accustomed to getting local information online, a portion of these ad budgets will migrate from the "old" media to the "new" media. end of quote.

As far as I'm concerned, I believe this whole Heartedly. I would also like to add a query to every one: What would it take for every company in the world to put there product online?

For example, Newspaper companies still distribute their newspaper at newstands and coffee shops and the such.. What would it take for that system to become obsolete? What would it take to just distribute their newspaper only on the internet? I have tried to answer this question from many angles but I never seem to get anywhere. Maybe by posting it here I can get a more complete r response.

One of my responses:

One invention I feel needs to be created, is a portable internet display. A tool that will allow someone to explore the internet and small enough that they can carry it everywhere. This could solve the problem of how people like reading the newspaper at the dinner table. They could instead bring there portable Internet Device (PID).


P.S. Maybe Im asking the wrong question.. Either way.. I hope someone responds..

[return to message index]

RE: A tangent to the discussion of the net

Anthony Mrazik <>

Thu, 05 Sep 1996 20:21 -0400

>For example, Newspaper companies still distribute their newspaper at >newstands and coffee shops and the such.. What would it take for that system to become obsolete? What would it take to just distribute their >newspaper only on the internet? I have tried to answer this question from >many angles but I never seem to get anywhere. Maybe by posting it here I >can get a more complete response.

It is going to take a long time before newspapers appear only on the internet. Reason: there aren't that many people with access to the internet. I have heard many figures, but I think that the percentage of people in the US with access is somewhere between 10-20%. We are lucky to have the computing resources we have. Of course for the tuition we pay they should be better, but that it another discussion.

Tony Mrazik

[return to message index]

Re: A tangent to the discussion of the net

Watts <>

Sat, 07 Sep 1996 12:38 -0400

In response to Dan's question about the migration from "old" media to "new" media:

With all the hype about the net and getting everything on the net, people often overlook the fact that the net is simply not a good medium for everyone and everything.

IMHO I don't think that print will ever be completely replaced by on-line print. I believe that more and more things will become available through the electronic medium, but I think things such as legal documents will need hard copies just in case something happens to the virtual copies.

I believe the best way to maximize electronic media is to integrate it into our lives, not let it take over our lives.



@}~~~)~~~~~ @}~~~)~~~~~ @}~~~)~~~~~ @}~~~)~~~~~ @}~~~)~~~~~

"The soul would have no rainbows if the eyes had no tears."


Sarah TC Takatani


Professional Work:

Homepage: Temporarily off-line for reconstruction


[return to message index]

Re: A tangent to the discussion of the net

Bankim J. Tejani <>

Sat, 07 Sep 1996 15:24 -0400

It would take a lot for print media to become obselete.

First, a much bigger portion of the population will have to have cheap if not free access to the internet.

Second, people will have to use it. For example, my brother has his own account to the net. PPP, the works. However, I use it more than he does. That bridge has to be crossed before print becomes extinct.

Also, reading something in print, say in a magazine, has a completely different 'feel' than on the net.

These are just some of the thresholds that must be crossed for print to become a dinosaur.

Bankim J. Tejani # #

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - Class of 1999

Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate.

"The eyes of truth are always watching you." -- Enigma

The Roots of Evil and Prejudice: a. Religion b. Apathy c. Humans

[return to message index]

© 1996. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. All rights reserved.
Class web site created Fall 1996 by:
Ted Cooper, Brian Mardirosian, Tony Mrazik, and Sarah Takatani.