<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><xml><records><record><database name="!wdg&apos;s ref list_v8.enl" path="/Users/gray/Documents/!wdg&apos;s ref list_v8.enl">!wdg&apos;s ref list_v8.enl</database><source-app name="EndNote" version="10.0">EndNote</source-app><rec-number>2117</rec-number><ref-type name="Conference Paper">47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gray, Wayne D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Veksler, V. Daniel</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bruno G. Bara</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lawrence Barsalou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monica Bucciarelli</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The acquisition and asymmetric transfer of interactive routines</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci2005</style></secondary-title></titles><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">809-814</style></pages><dates><year><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Austin, TX</style></pub-location><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cognitive Science Society</style></publisher><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We investigate the ways in which small changes in the cost of using an interface influence interactive behavior. During the Training Phase of the study, subjects in two interface conditions acquired two different sets of interactive routines for programming the shows. During the Transfer Phase we observed asymmetric transfer. In one case, Subjects immediately abandoned the interactive routines they had used during training and adopted the other set of routines. In the other case, Subjects held steadfast to their original set. We discuss both acquisition and asymmetric transfer in terms of cost-benefit tradeoffs in interacting with the two task environments.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="Times New Roman" size="10">Support for the writing and the research for this paper was provided in part by a grant to Wayne Gray from the Office of Naval Research ONR #N000140310046.</style></notes><urls><pdf-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internal-pdf://GrayVeksler05_CogSciConf-2130982400/GrayVeksler05_CogSciConf.pdf</style></url></pdf-urls></urls><research-notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ONR</style></research-notes></record></records></xml>